United States v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
948 F.2d 66 · 1991
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Alimeg, Inc. v. Shlim · United States v. Akitoye · United States v. Bruckman · United States v. Jimenez-Rivera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[UJpon completion of the term of imprisonment, the defendant is to be surrendered to a duly-authorized immigration official for deportation in accordance with the established procedures provided by the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 , et seq. As a further condition of supervised release, if ordered deported, defendant shall remain outside the United States during that time.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]e have required strict compliance with Rule 32(c)(3)(D).... we shall remand this case for the purpose of attaching [a written record of the court's findings on contested factual matters] to the PSI.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The purpose of Rule 32(c)(3)(D) is to guarantee that the Bureau of Prisons has the record of the court's findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.