Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 948 F.2d 684 - Rodriguez v. Maynard

Rodriguez v. Maynard’s Empirical Analysis

948 F.2d 684 · 1991

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Steele v. Young (1993), United States of America v. Kevin Roberson (1999)

51 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

660199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Murray v. Carrier · Sanders v. United States · McCleskey v. Zant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be something external to the petitioner, something that cannot fairly be attributed to him.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] petitioner who presents new claims in a second or subsequent federal habeas petition must show both cause for failing to present those claims in an earlier habeas petition and prejudice therefrom.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he cause and prejudice standard applies to pro se petitioners just as it applies to petitioners represented by counsel.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.