Daoud v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Amanullah v. Nelson · Vasile v. Gonzales · Mehilli v. Gonzales · Larngar v. Holder · Sulaiman v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“he did not contend before the BIA that the BIA could not rely on the regulations identified by the IJ and the corollary BIA regulation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Manguriu v. Garland“the BIA did consider, and reject, the application of equitable tolling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. James v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.