948 N.W.2d
Volume 948 — North Western Reporter, Second Series
10 opinions
- 948 N.W.2d 25Instasi v. Hiebert (2020)
A court of this state may modify a child custody determination made by a court of another state if the court of the other state determines it no longer has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction or that a court of this state would be a more convenient forum.
- 948 N.W.2d 182State on behalf of Tina K. v. Adam B. (2020)
- 948 N.W.2d 194Moser v. State (2020)
- 948 N.W.2d 212AVG Partners I v. Genesis Health Clubs (2020)
- 948 N.W.2d 306State v. Barber (2020)
- 948 N.W.2d 708First State Bank Neb. v. MP Nexlevel (2020)
- 948 N.W.2d 725Lassalle v. State (2020)
- 948 N.W.2d 814Woelfel v. Gifford (2020)
Post-judgment modification of residential responsibility is governed by statute which provides the standard for a court to apply. When a prior judgement establishes joint or equal residential responsibility, modification first requires a determination to award primary residential responsibility. A residential responsibility order provision that automatically transfers primary residential responsibility on the happening of a condition is against public policy.
- 948 N.W.2d 829Cass County Joint Water Resource District v. Aaland (2020)
Under Rule 8, N.D.R.App.P., the Court has the authority to grant a stay pending appeal. The Court considers four criteria when deciding whether to grant an application for a stay: 1) a strong showing that the appellant is likely to succeed on appeal 2) that unless the stay is granted, the appellant will suffer irreparable injury 3) that no substantial harm will come to any party by reason of the issuance of the stay and 4) that granting the stay will do no harm to the public interest.
- 948 N.W.2d 837State v. Tolbert (2020)
The criminal judgment entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).