Hamill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably Gould v. State (2006), Bitz v. State (2003)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gibson v. United States · Bishop v. State · Cutbirth v. State · Hamill v. State · Capwell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“show good cause why the issue was not raised at an earlier opportunity, the court may decline to consider the issue.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“). Tucker therefore controls Mr. Leonard's case, and not Sweets. [T10]) We decided Tucker before Mr. Leonard was charged, and long before his trial and appeal. He therefore had every opportunity to present his double jeopardy claim in his initial appeal. He failed to do so. We have long held that issues which could have been raised in a prior proceeding are”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Goetzel v. State · Gould v. State“correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.