¶1ORDER
¶2Appellant, Richard Barber, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).