McQueen v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2018
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · McQueen v. Scroggy · Gross v. Commonwealth · McQueen v. Commonwealth · State v. Richmond
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“CR 60.02 is not a separate avenue of appeal to be pursued in addition to other remedies, but is available only to raise issues which cannot be raised in other proceedings”); Urban Renewal & Community Dev. Agency v. Goodwin, Ky., 514 S.W.2d 190, 191 (1974). 11 . Mathews v. Mathews, Ky.App., 731 S.W.2d 832, 834 (1987)(”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Faris v. Stone“affirmatively allege facts which, if true, justify vacating the judgment and further allege special cireum-stances that justify CR 60.02 relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a CR 60.02 movant must demonstrate why he is entitled to this special, extraordinary relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.