Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 948 SW2D 757 - State v. Kelly

State v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Adams v. Williams · Brown v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is difficult to define with precision the quantity of corroboration necessary to demonstrate the informant’s veracity [or basis of knowledge]. Certainly, more than the corroboration of a few minor elements of the story is necessary, especially if those elements involve non-suspect behavior. It is equally certain, though, that the police need not corroborate every detail of an informant’s report to establish sufficient evidence of his veracity [or basis of knowledge].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.