Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 A2D 984 - State v. Barkmeyer

State v. Barkmeyer’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Edwards v. Arizona · Ornelas v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he trial justice has a 'front row seat' during the trial so that he can best evaluate the effects of any prejudice on the jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “a trial justice's decision on a motion to pass the case is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial justice, and this Court will not disturb the ruling on such a motion absent an abuse of discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “It is well settled that a decision to pass a case and declare a mistrial are matters left to the sound discretion of the trial justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.