Herrera v. Harkins’s Empirical Analysis
949 F.2d 1096 · 1991
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Russ v. Uppah (1992), Olson v. Hart (1992)
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Haines v. Kerner · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Hall v. Bellmon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“challenged] a constitutional defect in an individual parole hearing, where the remedy lies in providing a new parole hearing, [he] must file a habeas peti tion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“seek[s] injunctive or declaratory relief to correct constitutionally defective parole procedures, section 1983 remains available.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reed v. McKune“Declaratory and Injunctive relief ordering the Defendants to stop denying Plaintiff Parole Recommendations based on”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.