Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 F.2d 1147 - Farrel Corp. v. United States International Trade Commission

Farrel Corp. v. United States International Trade Commission’s Empirical Analysis

949 F.2d 1147 · 1991

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2015

3 federal appellate ·

80199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Southeastern Community College v. Davis · Shanferoke Coal Supply Corporation v. Westchester Service Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To recognize an additional exception [to a statute requiring the ITC to conclude investigations with findings] would not only violate traditional canons of statutory interpretation, but, in this case, would create an exception inconsistent with those specified by Congress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “While this court generally reviews ITC interpretations of statutory provisions de novo, some deference to constructions by the agency charged with its administration may be appropriate, particularly if technical issues requiring some expertise are involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The issue to be decided by this court is whether the statute is capable of more than one interpretation and whether the agency's interpretation is reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.