Abramson v. Gonzalez’s Empirical Analysis
949 F.2d 1567 · 1992
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Maynard v. Board of Regents of the Division of Universities of the Florida Department of Education (2003), 2 Cal. 4th 999 - Moore v. California State Board of Accountancy (1992)
22 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although `[l]eave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires,' a motion to amend may be denied on `numerous grounds' such as `undue delay, undue prejudice to the defendants, and futility of the amendment.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“(1) No person in the state may claim, either orally or in writing, to possess an academic degree, as defined in s. 246.021, or the title associated with said degree, unless the person has, in fact, been awarded said degree from an institution that is: (a) Accredited by a regional or professional accrediting agency recognized by the United States Department of Education or the Council on Postsecondary Education; (b) Provided, operated, and supported by a state government or any of its political subdivisions or by the Federal Government; (e) A school, institute, college or university chartered outside the United States, the academic degree from which has been validated by an accrediting agency approved by the United States Department of Education as equivalent to a baccalaureate or postbaecalaureate degree conferred by a regionally accredited college or university in the United States; (d) Licensed by the State Board of Independent Colleges and Universities pursuant to ss. 246.011-246.151 or exempt from licensure pursuant to s. 246.085; or (e) A religious seminary, institute, college or university which offers only educational programs that prepare students for a religious vocation, career, occupation, profession, or lifework, and the nomenclature of whose certificates, diplomas, or degrees clearly identifies the religious character of the educational program. (2) No person awarded a doctorate degree from an institution not listed in subsection (1) shall claim in the state, eit”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Strang v. Satz“We hold that as long as Florida has not restricted the practice of psychology, the state may not prevent the plaintiffs from calling themselves psychologists in their commercial speech. If they are allowed to practice psychology, as they apparently are until October 1, 1995 when the law changes, they must be allowed to say truthful things about their work. As long as the plaintiffs do not hold themselves out as licensed professionals, they are not saying anything untruthful, for they are in fact psychologists and are permitted to practice that profession under current state law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.