Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 F.2d 325 - Lewis v. Beeler

Lewis v. Beeler’s Empirical Analysis

949 F.2d 325 · 1991

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
August 2011
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2011

14 federal appellate · 4 district ·

120199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Carter v. Nesby · Solomon v. Elsea · Hackett v. United States Parole Commission · Kramer v. Oc Jenkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A court of review need only determine whether the information relied on by the Commission is sufficient to provide a factual basis for its reasons. The inquiry is not whether the Commission's decision is supported by the preponderance of the evidence, or even by substantial evidence; the inquiry is only whether there is a rational basis in the record for the Commission's conclusions embodied in its statement of reasons.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the decision is arbitrary and capricious or is an abuse of discretion.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “while we might not have concluded that Lewis was the Tylenol murderer based on this evidence, it provides a rational basis for the Commission's finding to that effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.