Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 F.2d 624 - Resolution Trust Corp. v. Elman

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Elman’s Empirical Analysis

949 F.2d 624 · 1991

Citation profile

146
cited by 146 later decisions
8
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 14 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 146 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably Marquis v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1992), Able v. United States (1995)

52 federal appellate · 14 district · 8 state decisions

1260199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yakus v. United States · Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc. · Virginian Ry Co v. System Federation No 40 · Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance · Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. Schlesinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is likely to succeed on the merits, or [that] there are 'sufficiently serious questions going to the merits' and the 'balance of hardships tips decidedly' its way.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(D) Limitation on judicial review Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no court shall have jurisdiction over— (i) any claim or action for payment from, or any action seeking a determination of rights with respect to, the assets of any depository institution for which the Corporation has been appointed receiver, including assets which the Corporation may acquire from itself as such receiver; or (ii) any claim relating to any act or omission of such institution or the Corporation as receiver.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he statute means just what it says, and, accordingly ... a claimant must first present its case to the RTC under the administrative procedure erected by FIRREA before seeking relief in the federal courts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.