Gilbert v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis
949 F.2d 637 · 1991
Citation profile
56 federal appellate · 28 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 177 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably White v. York International Corp. (1995), D'Amico v. City of New York (1998)
56 federal appellate · 28 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Singleton v. Wulff · Southeastern Community College v. Davis · School Board of Nassau County Florida v. H Arline · PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 177 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability ... shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance----”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he employer is given the ultimate burden of proof on the issue of reasonable accommodation. See 45 C.F.R. § 84.12 (a) (employer covered by Act “shall make reasonable accommodation ... unless [it] can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of its program”)....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“some reasonable assistance or job modification by the employer.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.