Rolo v. General Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
949 F.2d 695 · 1991
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Victaulic Co. v. Tieman (2007), Rolo
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Will v. United States · Carson v. American Brands, Inc. · Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Moreover, 'the collateral order doctrine has always been construed narrowly by this [C]ourt,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Richman Brothers Records, Inc. v. U.S. Sprint Communications Company, Richman Brothers Records, Inc., in No. 90-5607. U.S. Telecom, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, as a Partner in U.S. Sprint Communications Company Gte Communications Services Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, as a Partner in U.S. Sprint Communications Company U.S. Sprint Communications Company, a New York Partnership v. Richman Brothers Records, Inc., U.S. Sprint Communications Company, in No. 90-5657 · Richman Brothers Records Inc v. US Sprint Communications Company“scrutiny of the merits of the controversy”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Richman Brothers Records, Inc. v. U.S. Sprint Communications Company, Richman Brothers Records, Inc., in No. 90-5607. U.S. Telecom, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, as a Partner in U.S. Sprint Communications Company Gte Communications Services Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, as a Partner in U.S. Sprint Communications Company U.S. Sprint Communications Company, a New York Partnership v. Richman Brothers Records, Inc., U.S. Sprint Communications Company, in No. 90-5657 · Richman Brothers Records Inc v. US Sprint Communications Company“If a district court decides to stay proceedings for an indeterminate period and .a party has competent and specific evidence tending to show that it will be unable to secure effective relief when the stay is terminated, the party in such jeopardy, in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, is entitled to have a motion for pendente lite relief considered on its merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.