Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 F.2d 713 - United States v. Romulus

United States v. Romulus’s Empirical Analysis

949 F.2d 713 · 1991

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

81 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States v. Wong (1994), United States v. Stewart (2001)

81 federal appellate · 1 district ·

780199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5031 · 18 U.S.C. § 5032 · 18 U.S.C. § 5036 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Delaware v. Prouse · Lane v. Peterson · In re Disbarment of McManus · National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc. v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees · United States v. Chambers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that acquitted conduct may properly be used to enhance a sentence once a requisite finding is made by the sentencing judge.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'consciously ... with the purpose of obstructing justice.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he question of whether the interest of justice is served by the transfer of a juvenile for adult prosecution is a decision within the broad discretion of the district court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.