Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 F.2d 890 - Nasierowski Brothers Investment Company v. City of Sterling Heights

Nasierowski Brothers Investment Company v. City of Sterling Heights’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
9
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale (1998), No. 90-1091 (1992)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions

3101990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · Salve Regina College v. Russell · Withrow v. Larkin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a procedural due process claim is instantly cognizable in federal court without requiring a final decision ... from the responsible municipal agency.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the allegedly infirm process is an injury in itself,' whereas, in the context of a takings claim, the alleged injury ... cannot be assessed with any degree of certainty until the municipality arrives at a final decision.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[plaintiff] had a property interest in the old zoning classification within which his development was permitted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.