Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 NE2D 839 - K.W. v. B.J.

K.W. v. B.J.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Trost-Steffen v. Steffen · Case v. Case · G.B. v. State · Goldsmith v. Jones · Lighty v. Lighty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On motion and upon such terms as are just the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a judgment, including a judgment by default, for the following reasons: (1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect .... [[Image here]] ... A movant filing a motion for reason[ ](1) ... must allege a meritorious claim or defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.