Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 So. 2d 253 - Smith v. State

949 So. 2d 253 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tibbs v. Florida · Zehrbach v. United States · 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State · Miller v. Johnson · 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is the trial judge's proper task to review the evidence to determine the presence or absence of competent evidence from which the jury could infer guilt to the exclusion of all other inferences. That view of the evidence must be taken in the light most favorable to the state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.