949 So. 2d 662 - Chambers v. Saucier’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 631 So. 2d 1183 - New v. New · Sonnier v. Safeway Insurance Co. · 819 So. 2d 1108 - Casey v. Casey · 719 So. 2d 702 - Saucier v. Saucier · Francis v. BFI
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. When there is a child support award in a specific amount per child, the award for each child shall terminate automatically without any action by the obligor upon each child’s attaining the age of majority, or upon emancipation relieving the child of the disabilities attached to minority. B. When there is a child support award in globo for two or more children, the award shall terminate automatically and without any action by the obligor when the youngest child for whose benefit the award was made attains the age of majority or is emancipated relieving the child of the disabilities attached to minority.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.