Hodges v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · 584 So. 2d 426 - Mohr v. State · 687 So. 2d 1124 - Foster v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“supported by extraneous materials that were not available on direct appeal, our consideration of the issue is not barred by res judicata.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.