¶1ORDER
¶2Ike Crawford (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He alleges the motion court erred when it found that l)trial counsel was not ineffective and 2)that motion counsel did not abandon him. We affirm. An extended opinion would, have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum detailing our reasons for affirming the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).