¶1ORDER
¶2Appellant claims the trial court erred in not overruling comments made by the prosecution during questioning of state’s key witness. Appellant was jury tried and convicted on two counts of first degree burglary (eighteen years each — to be served concurrently) and two counts of first degree robbery (eighteen years concurrent, but consecutive to burglary counts), and was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender. Judgement affirmed. Rule 30.25(b)