Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 SW2D 579 - Moss v. Commonwealth

Moss v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
3
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Tamme v. Commonwealth (1998), Lanham v. Commonwealth (2005)

34 state decisions

220199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sanborn v. Commonwealth · Sanders v. Commonwealth · Ward v. Commonwealth · Mabe v. Commonwealth · Howard v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A witness's opinion about the truth of the testimony of another witness is not permitted. Neither expert nor lay witnesses may testify that another witness or a defendant is lying or faking. That determination is within the exclusive province of the jury.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A witness should not be required to characterize the testimony of another witness, particularly a well-respected police officer, as lying. Such a characterization places the witness in such an unflattering light as to potentially undermine his entire testimony. Counsel should be sufficiently articulate to show the jury where the testimony of the witnesses differ without resort to blunt force.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “badgered into stating ... a leading witness for the Commonwealth[ ] was lying.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.