Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 949 SW2D 783 - Libhart v. Copeland

Libhart v. Copeland’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Harris v. Matthews (2007), Westbrook v. Penley (2007)

29 state decisions

200199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 107

Relies on In Re King's Estate · Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co. · Hall v. Cole · Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Board · Watson v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the defendant made a material representation; (2) which was false; (3) the defendant made the representation knowing it to be false or made it recklessly as a positive assertion without any knowledge of its truth; (4) the defendant intended that the plaintiff act upon the representation; (5) the plaintiff acted in reliance upon the representation; and (6) suffered injury as a result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`[T]he proceedings of the association are subject to judicial review where there is fraud, oppression, or bad faith, or property or civil rights are invaded, or the proceedings in question are violative of the laws of the [association], or the law of the land, or are illegal.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “property owner is qualified to testify to the market value of his property,” and cited Taiwan Shrimp for the proposition that a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.