Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

949 S.W.2d 79

Woody v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1997

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-04-22

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2000

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-04-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/949/sw2d/79 · .json · Public domain