Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

95 A.D. 273

Beck v. Bohm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1904-07-01

Appeal by the defendants, Minnie Bohm and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 4th day of April, 1904, granting a motion for discovery.

Decided 1904-07-01

Per Curiam:

¶1We do not think that we should sanction the practice of requiring a defendant to produce for inspection a deed at a photographer’s studio so that it might be photographed. We think the better practice is to direct that the deed should be placed in the custody of *274the county clerk with permission to the plaintiff to inspect it and, if he desires, to have it photographed. .

¶2The order accordingly should be so modified, without costs.

¶3Present—O’Brien, Ingraham, McLaughlin,. Hatch and Laughlin, JJ.

¶4Order modified, without costs.

/95/ad/273 · .json · Public domain