Sturm v. Heim’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 1984 · most notably Arizona Public Service Company v. Brittain (1971), 6 Ariz. App. 213 - Bailey v. Montgomery Ward and Company (1967)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 121 Cal. App. 2d 325 - Major-Blakeney Corp. v. Jenkins · Glad Tidings Church of America v. Hinkley · Fratt v. Daniels-Jones Co. · Alger v. Brighter Days Mining Corp. · Clark v. Compania Ganadera De Cananea, S. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"* * * whatever competent evidence appellants have introduced, including all inferences that can reasonably be drawn therefrom, is assumed to be true, and, if the evidence is of such character that reasonable minds may differ on the inferences to be drawn therefrom, the case must be submitted to the jury."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Where time is of the essence of the contract, a default in payments entitles the sellers to treat the contract as at an end.” Sturm v. Heim, 95 Ariz. 300, 303 , 389 P.2d 702, 704 (1964).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trevillian v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.