Sanchez v. Stremel’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co. (1982), Yoo Thun Lim v. Crespin (1966)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Provoo · Ruth v. Rhodes · Robelen Piano Company v. Di Fonzo · Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co. · Zugsmith v. Mullins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule observed by all members of the Bar in argument to the jury, is that it is improper to argue to the jury that the court would not have submitted the issue unless there was evidence to support it.” Sanchez, 95 Ariz. at 395 , 391 P.2d at 559 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Juarez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.