State v. Corrales’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently May 1985 · most notably State v. Maloney (1970), State v. Sowards (1965)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Evans · State v. Vallejos · State v. Sorrell · State v. Polan · State v. Dutton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[t]he general rule is that the state may ask the defendant, when he is a witness, whether he was previously convicted of a felony....'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““Now, Ladies and Gentlemen, in this case, where there are three separate charges against the defendant, you must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the defendant with respect to any one of the charges independent of the other two. “In other words, it’s not enough to conclude that because he is guilty of one count, he is guilty of the other two, but you must be satisfied on each individual charge of the three counts, you must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty of that charge; and, unless you are, of course, as I said, it’s your duty to acquit him of that charge.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Boag““* * * The requested instruction on ‘identification’ would not have added anything to these general instructions given to the jury. The trial court’s references to the presumption of innocence, the necessity of proving ‘all material allegations,’ and the credit to be given witnesses would certainly have meaning for the jury as applied to the testimony of the ‘identity’ witnesses. The weight to be given the testimony of such witnesses is a matter for the determination of the jury or court trying the case, (citations omitted)” State v. Corrales, 95 Ariz. 401, 404 , 391 P.2d 563, 565-566 (1964).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.