State v. Tigue’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
77 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably State v. Bearden (1965), State v. Harvill (1970)
77 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · State v. Daymus · State v. Quintana · State v. Andrade · State v. Cox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * the court on its own motion is under a duty to give proper instructions as to the effect of circumstantial evidence, if the prosecution must rely exclusively on circumstantial evidence tb convict.” (Emphasis in original.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““ T talked with him for awhile. We just visited and then I asked him if he had anything on him that he shouldn’t have, and he told me no, he didn’t — go ahead — and held his arms up. And at that time I searched him and found the monies.’ ” (Emphasis in the original.) 95 Ariz. at 48 , 386 P.2d at 405 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Farmer““[T]his case must be reversed for failure to submit an instruction on circumstantial evidence. The entire evidence against the defendants was circumstantial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Love
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.