Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 ARIZ 60 - State v. Kemp

State v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 1965
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Robertson v. State of Florida · State v. Berry, 24233 (mo.banc 1923) · Dukes v. Commonwealth · Cradle v. United States · State v. . Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Even assuming the evidence was illegally obtained, as a matter of law and procedure, the failure to object to its admissibility at the time it is presented by the prosecution constitutes a waiver on the part of the defendant. Indeed, the fact that the defense motions for suppressing evidence and quashing affidavits or warrants have been overruled by the court does not relieve the accused or his counsel from the duty of objecting to the admission of such evidence on the grounds that it was illegally obtained.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.