Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 Ariz. 84 - State v. Woodring

State v. Woodring’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2009

16 state decisions

8019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 30 Cal. 2d 589 - People v. Greer · Rosacker v. Rosacker · 66 Cal. App. 2d 491 - People v. Crooms · Morgan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A.R.S. § 13-1592 does not, however, require a finding by the jury in every case in which a plea of double jeopardy is interjected. If the previous prosecution could not constitute double jeopardy as a matter of law, the trial court may so rule without presenting the plea to the trier of fact.” 95 Ariz. at 85 , 386 P.2d at 852 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.