Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

95 Ark. 148

Speed v. Fry

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 16, 1910

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1910-05-16

30 Ark. 520; Id. 5x2. If a minor, after coming of age, gives her guardian a receipt showing that he has paid her all that he was due her, it will, in the absence of fraud, be binding upon the minor. 83 Ark. 226. A guardian must have an order of court before he spends his ward’s money. Kirby’s Dig., § 3792; 63 Ark. 450. The law casts upon the guardian the burden of proving every item of his account which is challenged. 76 Ark. 219.

Relies on Walker v. Noll · Matthews v. Lane · James v. Dyer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

reversed · Decided 1910-05-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 1966

11 state decisions

30191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hart, J.

¶1In the year 1901 J. C. Speed was appointed the guardian of his minor child, Effie Speed, who had inherited an estate of the value of $150 from a deceased relative. No further steps were taken in the guardianship until 1908, .when J. C. Speed filed his final settlement. Effie Speed, who had become of full age, filed exceptions to the settlement.

¶2At its May term, 1909, the probate court, after hearing the evidence adduced by both parties, found that the guardian was indebted to his ward in the sum of $95.25, and rendered judgment accordingly. On the 18th day of June, 1909, J. C. Speed filed an affidavit for appeal to the circuit court.

¶3Effie Speed married and became Effie Ery, and the case was docketed and tried in the circuit court under her married name. The circuit court rendered judgment in her favor for $126, and J. C. Speed has appealed to this court.

¶4The record shows that J. C. Speed filed an affidavit and prayer for appeal in the usual form to the circuit court, but it does mot show ¡that the probate court made an order granting the appeal. This was necessary in order to give the circuit court jurisdiction. Kirby’s Digest, § 1348; Matthews v. Lane, 65 Ark. 420 and cases cited; Walker v. Noll, 92 Ark. 148.

¶5This court has held that the appellee may waive the want of an affidavit for appeal in the circuit court by failing to move to dismiss. James v. Dyer, 31 Ark. 489. The reason is that the affidavit and prayer for appeal is a regulation for the sole benefit of fhe appellee. But the order of the probate court granting the appeal is a prerequisite to the right of the circuit court to exercise jurisdiction, and for that reason can not be waived. It follows, therefore, that the circuit court should have dismissed the appeal because no order of the probate court granting it was made, and for this error the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the circuit court to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/95/ark/148 · .json · Public domain