In Re Monetary Group’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on Citizens' Central National Bank v. Appleton · 352 F. Supp. 665 - In Re Zsa Zsa Limited · Viacom International Inc. v. Tandem Productions, Inc. · Appleton v. Citizens' Central National Bank · Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he repeated communications between Atkins and the Morgan Banks demonstrate detailed knowledge of the transactions on the part of Groups' managing partner. Public financial statements and proxy materials of Groups sent to all partners describe in detail the existence and activities of Leasing and the fact that Groups had guaranteed those loans.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“given '[as] an inducement to you for, and in consideration of, your making or extending one or more loans ... to the Leasing Group, Inc.' ... Each guaranty specifies the amounts guaranteed, which equals the amounts of the loans supported by the related notes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“regular payments pursuant to the guaranties for two years, assum[ing] the debts directly in 1983, and repeatedly affirm[ing] its intention to continue to honor its obligations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.