Jaeger v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2003 · most notably 49 Cal. 2d 652 - Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co. (1958), 227 Cal. App. 2d 675 - Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304 (1964)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 9 Cal. 2d 409 - Herbert v. Lankershim · Stein v. United R.R. of S.F. · 49 Cal. App. 2d 647 - Jones v. Bayley · 81 Cal. App. 2d 495 - Guay v. American President Lines, Ltd. · Temple v. De Mirjian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"* * * While it would not have been error to have given such an instruction [on unavoidable accident], it was not error to refuse to give it where all elements of defendant's liability were covered by other instructions. The defendant is not entitled to have his defense overemphasized and cannot complain that his defense is not stated in a particular way, as long as the defense is adequately and fairly covered."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In the interest of a full and complete understanding of the law applicable to the case it was necessary that the jury be instructed on the major subjects raised by the pleadings even if a modification in this or other respects was required to make a more acceptable presentation of the law. We think this is the rule approved by statute and judicial decision where fundamentals are involved, there being no attempt on the part of the author to mislead the court or jury by resorting to equivocally or ingeniously phrased requests, especially in cases where the jury otherwise would be left uninstructed on vital issues of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in law we recognize what is termed an unavoidable or inevitable accident”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.