People v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 1988 · most notably State v. Oldham (1968), People v. Corenevsky (1954)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 52 Cal. App. 2d 685 - People v. Battilana · People v. Buyle · 26 Cal. App. 2d 213 - People v. Burley · 79 Cal. App. 682 - People v. Franco · 131 Cal. App. 605 - People v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“occupied by a named telephone company. At the trial the defendant admitted and the evidence established that he broke into the telephone booth and took the money on the dates specified in the three counts of the information, and he was convicted. His sole contention in his appeal from the judgment of conviction was that a telephone booth is not a building within the meaning of Section 459 of the California Penal Code, which reads in pertinent part:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.