95 Cal. App. 4th 267 - Lynch v. Warwick’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 47 Cal. 3d 654 - Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. · 25 Cal. 4th 1194 - Coscia v. McKenna & Cuneo · 24 Cal. 4th 676 - Barner v. Leeds · 19 Cal. 4th 532 - Wiley v. County of San Diego · 67 Cal. App. 4th 1509 - Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he proof of tort causation problem posited by the majority does not exist when the claim, as in this case, is limited to the reasonable value of services rendered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Bloomer v. Gibson“[a] criminal defendant's guilt should not deprive him or her of the right to recover money paid to his or her attorney for legal representation that was not provided”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Bloomer v. Gibson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.