Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 CALAPP4TH 438 - In re Woodham

In re Woodham’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Moyal v. Lanphear · 171 Cal. App. 3d 59 - People v. Stewart · In Re Muszalski · People v. Tabb · 82 Cal. App. 4th 719 - Winikow v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This power shall not apply to advocacy of counsel before the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.