95 Cal. App. 4th 772 - People v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · 2 Cal. 3d 118 - People v. Marsden · 23 Cal. 3d 412 - People v. Pope
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]efendant cannot show prejudice.... He has not shown the loss of his [ Code of Civil Procedure section] 170.6 motion deprived him of a defense nor has he submitted even one example of prejudicial treatment by [the presiding judge].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.