Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 Colo. 223 - Froid v. Knowles

Froid v. Knowles’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
8
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Fauver v. Bell (1951), Schumacher v. Leslie (1950)

2 district · 27 state decisions

801934194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ross v. Erickson Construction Co. · Viita v. Fleming · O'Brien v. Lodi · Hotel Equipment Co. v. Liddell · Ruth v. Witherspoon-Englar Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The law does not attempt in any way to abridge the remedies which an employee of one person may have at law against a third person for a tort which such third person commits against him." (Emphasis added)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"(1) Where, at the time of the accident, both employer and employee are subject to the provisions of this chapter; and where the employer has complied with the provisions thereof regarding insurance. "(2) Where, at the time of the accident, the employee is performing service arising out of and in the course of his employment. "(3) Where the injury * * * is proximately caused by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, * * *". (Emphasis supplied.) C.R.S. '53, 81-13-2.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.