95 Conn. App. 39 - Simes v. Simes’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
October 2019
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 62
Relies on Roberts v. Roberts · Anderson v. Anderson · Hiss v. Hiss · Sweeney v. Sweeney · Demartino v. Demartino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he plaintiff had paid only $5000 of his $9500 monthly obligation.... The plaintiff, therefore, needed to make up the $4500 deficiency for each month. We accordingly conclude that the court's order permitting the $4500 monthly shortfall to be paid out of the plaintiff's equitable share of the residence did not alter the terms of the original order, but rather fashioned an appropriate remedy to protect the integrity of the original award.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an appropriate remedy to protect the integrity of the original judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.