Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 Conn. App. 436 - Valentine v. LaBow

95 Conn. App. 436 - Valentine v. LaBow’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford (2013), Watts v. Chittenden (2011)

60 state decisions

360200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Appleton v. Board of Education · Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Rubin · In Re SP · Giulietti v. Giulietti · Giulietti v. Giulietti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court has determined that [§] 52-577 is an occurrence statute, meaning that the time period within which a plaintiff must commence an action begins to run at the moment the act or omission complained of occurs.... Moreover, our Supreme Court has stated that [i]n construing our general tort statute of limitations ... § 52-577, which allows an action to be brought within three years from the date of the act or omission complained of, we have concluded that the history of that legislative choice of language precludes any construction thereof delaying the start of the limitation period until the cause of action has accrued or the injury has occurred.... The three year limitation period of § 52-577, therefore, begins with the date of the act or omission complained of, not the date when the plaintiff first discovers an injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[§] 52-577 is a statute of repose in that it sets a fixed limit after which the tortfeasor will not be held liable and in some cases will serve to bar an action before it accrues .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “As with any discretionary action of the trial court ... the ultimate [question for appellate review] is whether the trial court could have reasonably concluded as it did.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.