Hale v. Hardon’s Empirical Analysis
95 F. 747 · 1899
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1952
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Cole v. Cunningham · Davis v. Gray · Minnesota v. Barber · Canada Southern Ry Co v. Gebhard Same
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We may well observe at the outset that for many years the steady trend of federal decision has been in the direction of upholding and enforcing extra- territorially this class of liabilities according to the fair intendment of the local law in cases properly within the provisions thereof, except where enforcement would, unreasonably interfere with local vested creditor interests in states where enforcement is sought extraterritorially on grounds of comity, and perhaps, in some cases, where such enforcement would offend the general public policy of the state, while among the courts of the states there has been a diminishing diversity of decisions upon questions growing out of such statutory liabilities. It does not seem necessary to refer to the numerous decisions of the Supreme Court, and those of the various Circuit Courts of Appeal and of the Circuit Courts, so often cited, which sustain this general proposition. We shall therefore only refer, in this connection, to the more recent cases in the United States courts, of Rhodes v. Bank, 13 C. C. A. 612 , 66 Fed. 512 [ 34 L. R. A. 742 ]; Whitman v. Bank, 28 C. C. A. 404 , 83 Fed. 288 ; Elkhart Nat. Bank v. Northwestern Guaranty Loan Co., 30 C. C. A. 632 , 87 Fed. 252 ; Dexter v. Edmands (C. C.) 89 Fed. 467 ; and to the more recent decisions of the state courts, as showing the present tendency of judicial decision in such jurisdictions (Bagley v. Tyler, 43 Mo. App. 195 ; Guerney v. Moore, 131 Mo. 650 , 32 S. W. 1132 ; Ferguson”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lewis v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.