Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 F.2d 112 - Marlin v. Cardillo

Marlin v. Cardillo’s Empirical Analysis

95 F.2d 112 · 1938

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2002 · most notably Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki (1946), Strachan Shipping Co. v. Melvin (1964)

15 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

12019381940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 933

Relies on Sinclair v. United States · Chapman v. Hoage · Tatlow v. Bacon · Neutzel v. Ryans · Coney v. Mayor of Topeka

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If on account of a disability or death for which compensation is payable under this Act the person entitled to such compensation determines that some person other than the employer is liable in damages, he may elect, by giving notice to the deputy commissioner in such manner as the commission may provide, to receive such compensation or to recover damages against such third person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A showing of damage — or of the absence of it — is beside the point in such a case. Petitioner, having compromised and settled her claim against the third party without the approval of the employer or carrier, is not now in a position to demand anything more — if for no other reason — because the statute clearly says so.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.