Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
95 F.2d 203 · 1938
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1975
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 919 · 33 U.S.C. § 921 · 33 U.S.C. § 922 · 33 U.S.C. § 939
Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Crowell v. Benson · Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of Emigration · Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Schauffler · Wilshire Oil Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If not in accordance with law, a compensation order may be suspended or set aside, in whole or in part, through injunction proceedings, mandatory or otherwise, brought by any party in interest against the deputy commissioner making the order, and instituted in the Federal district court for the judicial district in which the injury occurred * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lynch v. Landy · Lynch v. Landy““That in the case of John T.. Clark, of Seattle, Washington, whose disability compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act of March 4, 1927, was terminated as of July 5, 1931, by a compensation order filed August 26, 1931,. the Employees’ Compensation Commission be, and it is hereby, authorized and directed to review such order in accordance with the procedure prescribed in respect of such claims in section 19 of said Act, and in accordance with such section to issue, a new compensation order which may terminate, continue, increase, or decrease such compensation, the provisions of sections 21 and 22 of the said Act, as amended, to the contrary notwithstanding: Provided, That such new order shall not affect any compensation paid under authority of the prior order.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on the ground of a change in conditions or because of a mistake in a determination of fact by the deputy commissioner,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.