Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 F.2d 386 - In re Doe

In re Doe’s Empirical Analysis

95 F.2d 386 · 1938

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
May 1977
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1977

8 federal appellate ·

6019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Borden's Farm Products Co. v. Baldwin · Sinclair v. United States · Gyra v. Windler · Barach's Case · In re Thresher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Disbarment is fitting only when the attorney has been guilty of corrupt conduct; of some attempt to suborn a witness, or to bribe a juror, or to forge a document, or to embezzle clients' property, or other things abhorrent to honest and fair dealing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.