Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 95 F.2d 562 - Grant v. Pilgrim

Grant v. Pilgrim’s Empirical Analysis

95 F.2d 562 · 1938

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 1974
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1974

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

5019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 30 U.S.C. § 23 · 30 U.S.C. § 26

Relies on Barton v. Barbour · Thompson v. State of Utah · Holland v. Challen · Johnson v. Towsley · Cameron v. United States

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.