In re Tinkoff’s Empirical Analysis
95 F.2d 651 · 1938
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1969
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Remington Rand, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Tinkoff v. United States · Tinkoff v. Zerbst · Tinkoff v. United States · Taylor v. Leary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * predicated upon - this court’s affirmance (Tinkoff v. United States, 7 Cir., 86 F.2d 868 ) of a judgment of the District Court for the Northern- District of Illinois based upon a jury’s verdict finding said Paysoff Tinkoff guilty of the felony of willfully attempting to defeat and evade income taxes owed by another individual and two companies for whom .he was counselor. Upon conviction of this charge said Tinkoff was sentenced to serve a sentence in a federal penitentiary. Upon affirmance of this sentence by the Circuit Court of Appeals, said Paysoff Tinkoff applied to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was denied ( 301 U.S. 689 , 57 S.Ct. 795 , 81 L.Ed. 1346 ) and a petition for rehearing, which was also denied ( 301 U.S. 715 , 57 S.Ct. 937 , 81 L.Ed. 1366 ).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.